汉语翻译成英语 那位翻译高手帮帮忙！
2024-06-01来源：编辑
"Adidas as a protection of the Mulaohu cub, fiercely protecting its classic stripe design." American "Forbes" magazine this appraisal Road. April 10, the giant German sports brand protection again won the "cub" victory. EU Court of the favorable ruling marks Adidas "three bars" Supremacy, toward "two bars," and "four bars" forward, it also marked the "fringe Supremacy" took Germany, began to Europe UNITA and global expansion. Despite the Adidas trademark three stripes, the EU Court's ruling in the legal able to stop any of our competitors use two, four stripes design. Court explained that the important is not the number of stripes, but whether it will be purchased with the Adidas trademark linked. Adidas defeat the object of this, including C & A, H & M, MArca Mode and Vendex International Bizhuangshang four. To this ruling, Adidas has been fought for 10 years. Or in the late 1990s, the Netherlands on Adidas to sue in the local courts, said that all four Bizhuangshang stripe design used by the two violations of its trademark rights. On the "difficult cases", the Netherlands Court protracted, the two sides last year until the final decision will be submitted to the EU court. EU court ruling, the case will once again return to the Netherlands court, the latter determined by the parties, such as the amount of compensation. In fact, in the 1970s, the German court had already made a final judgement, any two, three or four stripes of Adidas designs are "three bars" trademark.
In Germany, Adidas "fringe lawsuit" also continue to occur. In 2003, Adidas in Luxembourg prosecution Fitness World Trade Corporation. 2005, the United States Court for Adidas allegations Laerfulaolun and A & F, that their two stripes logo apparel and sports shoes infringed its trademark. But "five bars" design or exceptions. Since 1966, the United States K-Swiss footwear brand has been using undisputed five fringes. The EU this month in the court's ruling means that within the EU, clothing and sports shoes, if you use two, three or four stripes design, it is very likely violated the Adidas trademark. This, of course, is against Adidas competitors, but it also caused some dissatisfaction with the independent designers. London closes Lahedesen Eritrea renowned designers interviewed by the media, when it said that such a stripe design element "should not be a company's private property." She considered that the verdict of the most dangerous result is that "restrictions on the designers and inspired the creation of the fight against the entire design industry."
有语言工具可以帮助啊，一定对！
"Adidas as a protection of the Mulaohu cub, fiercely protecting its classic stripe design." American "Forbes" magazine this appraisal Road. April 10, the giant German sports brand protection again won the "cub" victory. EU Court of the favorable ruling marks Adidas "three bars" Supremacy, toward "two bars," and "four bars" forward, it also marked the "fringe Supremacy" took Germany, began to Europe UNITA and global expansion. Despite the Adidas trademark three stripes, the EU Court's ruling in the legal able to stop any of our competitors use two, four stripes design. Court explained that the important is not the number of stripes, but whether it will be purchased with the Adidas trademark linked. Adidas defeat the object of this, including C & A, H & M, MArca Mode and Vendex International Bizhuangshang four. To this ruling, Adidas has been fought for 10 years. Or in the late 1990s, the Netherlands on Adidas to sue in the local courts, said that all four Bizhuangshang stripe design used by the two violations of its trademark rights. On the "difficult cases", the Netherlands Court protracted, the two sides last year until the final decision will be submitted to the EU court. EU court ruling, the case will once again return to the Netherlands court, the latter determined by the parties, such as the amount of compensation. In fact, in the 1970s, the German court had already made a final judgement, any two, three or four stripes of Adidas designs are "three bars" trademark.
In Germany, Adidas "fringe lawsuit" also continue to occur. In 2003, Adidas in Luxembourg prosecution Fitness World Trade Corporation. 2005, the United States Court for Adidas allegations Laerfulaolun and A & F, that their two stripes logo apparel and sports shoes infringed its trademark. But "five bars" design or exceptions. Since 1966, the United States K-Swiss footwear brand has been using undisputed five fringes. The EU this month in the court's ruling means that within the EU, clothing and sports shoes, if you use two, three or four stripes design, it is very likely violated the Adidas trademark. This, of course, is against Adidas competitors, but it also caused some dissatisfaction with the independent designers. London closes Lahedesen Eritrea renowned designers interviewed by the media, when it said that such a stripe design element "should not be a company's private property." She considered that the verdict of the most dangerous result is that "restrictions on the designers and inspired the creation of the fight against the entire design industry."
In Germany, Adidas "fringe lawsuit" also continue to occur. In 2003, Adidas in Luxembourg prosecution Fitness World Trade Corporation. 2005, the United States Court for Adidas allegations Laerfulaolun and A & F, that their two stripes logo apparel and sports shoes infringed its trademark. But "five bars" design or exceptions. Since 1966, the United States K-Swiss footwear brand has been using undisputed five fringes. The EU this month in the court's ruling means that within the EU, clothing and sports shoes, if you use two, three or four stripes design, it is very likely violated the Adidas trademark. This, of course, is against Adidas competitors, but it also caused some dissatisfaction with the independent designers. London closes Lahedesen Eritrea renowned designers interviewed by the media, when it said that such a stripe design element "should not be a company's private property." She considered that the verdict of the most dangerous result is that "restrictions on the designers and inspired the creation of the fight against the entire design industry."
有语言工具可以帮助啊，一定对！
"Adidas as a protection of the Mulaohu cub, fiercely protecting its classic stripe design." American "Forbes" magazine this appraisal Road. April 10, the giant German sports brand protection again won the "cub" victory. EU Court of the favorable ruling marks Adidas "three bars" Supremacy, toward "two bars," and "four bars" forward, it also marked the "fringe Supremacy" took Germany, began to Europe UNITA and global expansion. Despite the Adidas trademark three stripes, the EU Court's ruling in the legal able to stop any of our competitors use two, four stripes design. Court explained that the important is not the number of stripes, but whether it will be purchased with the Adidas trademark linked. Adidas defeat the object of this, including C & A, H & M, MArca Mode and Vendex International Bizhuangshang four. To this ruling, Adidas has been fought for 10 years. Or in the late 1990s, the Netherlands on Adidas to sue in the local courts, said that all four Bizhuangshang stripe design used by the two violations of its trademark rights. On the "difficult cases", the Netherlands Court protracted, the two sides last year until the final decision will be submitted to the EU court. EU court ruling, the case will once again return to the Netherlands court, the latter determined by the parties, such as the amount of compensation. In fact, in the 1970s, the German court had already made a final judgement, any two, three or four stripes of Adidas designs are "three bars" trademark.
In Germany, Adidas "fringe lawsuit" also continue to occur. In 2003, Adidas in Luxembourg prosecution Fitness World Trade Corporation. 2005, the United States Court for Adidas allegations Laerfulaolun and A & F, that their two stripes logo apparel and sports shoes infringed its trademark. But "five bars" design or exceptions. Since 1966, the United States K-Swiss footwear brand has been using undisputed five fringes. The EU this month in the court's ruling means that within the EU, clothing and sports shoes, if you use two, three or four stripes design, it is very likely violated the Adidas trademark. This, of course, is against Adidas competitors, but it also caused some dissatisfaction with the independent designers. London closes Lahedesen Eritrea renowned designers interviewed by the media, when it said that such a stripe design element "should not be a company's private property." She considered that the verdict of the most dangerous result is that "restrictions on the designers and inspired the creation of the fight against the entire design industry."
